Recurrent SMS Training: Same Slides, Different Year?

Say the words “SMS recurrent training” in a room full of aviation folks and watch what happens. Shoulders drop. Someone checks their phone. Somebody quietly wonders if there’s coffee left.

I get it. We’ve all sat through the aviation equivalent of the flight attendant’s seatbelt demonstration: important, technically correct, and absolutely nobody is listening anymore.

Last year I wrote about why SMS training is more than a box to check, and a lot of that was about getting the program built and the right people trained in the first place. This time I want to talk about what happens after that. Because here’s what I keep noticing: the initial training gets all the attention, and then recurrent turns into the same slides, the same definitions, and the same click-next-to-continue. Different year, same deck.

Your Operation Changed. Did Your Training?

An SMS isn’t static. You add a new aircraft, pick up a new base, lose a few key people, or get busy enough that everyone’s running on fumes. Every one of those changes brings new risks with it. So why would the training stay frozen in time?

The best recurrent training I’ve seen pulls straight from the company’s own backyard:

• Trends from your safety reports
• Lessons from a recent hazard report or investigation
• Whatever is actually keeping people up at night right now

If unstable approaches or fatigue reports are creeping up, that’s your training topic. Not a re-read of the SMS definition. People pay attention when you’re talking about their operation, and they tune out when it sounds like it could be any company anywhere.

Stop Presenting. Start Asking.

If I could change one thing about recurrent training, it would be getting rid of the lecture. People remember what they have to think about, not what they’re read to.

Hand them a scenario instead:

• A crew with time pressure and weather going the wrong way
• A maintenance team chasing a discrepancy late at night
• A scheduler trying to square operational demand with duty limits

Then ask the questions that matter. What are the risks? What would you do? Would you report it, and why or why not?

That last one is my favorite, because the answers are honest. You find out very quickly where people really are on reporting, and it usually isn’t where the slide deck says they are. It’s also where you start hearing the things that never make it onto a formal report.

Make It a Conversation

This only works if people feel safe talking. That takes a facilitator who guides instead of dominates, and leadership who show up and listen instead of steering the conversation toward the “right” answer. When someone feels heard in the training room, they’re far more likely to speak up when it counts, out on the ramp or in the hangar.

Not Everyone Lives in the Same SMS

As I wrote earlier this year about maintenance, pilots and technicians come at safety from very different directions. Add in schedulers, dispatch, and leadership, and “one size fits all” starts to look more like “one size fits nobody.”

• Pilots: decision-making, fatigue, and reporting
• Maintenance: error management, communication, and documentation
• Schedulers and dispatch: workload, fatigue risk, and operational pressure
• Leadership: accountability, culture, and how their decisions ripple down

Experience matters too. A new hire needs the basics. Your 20-year veteran needs a real discussion, and he or she will let you know pretty quickly if you hand them the basics again.

Reinforce It Without Repeating It

You still need to keep the core concepts fresh. Just do it through application instead of definitions. How does hazard reporting actually work here, on a regular Tuesday? What does Just Culture look like when something goes sideways? How do we assess risk when the schedule is tight?

Same principles, new angle. It keeps them fresh without feeling like Groundhog Day.

Let the Training Feed the System

Here’s the part that often gets missed: recurrent training can be one of your best sources of safety data. If the same theme keeps surfacing in your sessions, pay attention. It could be an unrecognized hazard, a barrier to reporting, or a gap in a procedure or in communication. Take it back to your hazard log and your safety meetings. When that happens, training stops being a standalone event and becomes part of the SMS: a feedback loop instead of a checkbox.

Final Thought

Recurrent training isn’t about repeating the past. It’s about getting people ready for what’s coming, and keeping the SMS something people use rather than something sitting in a binder.

Because safety isn’t built in a classroom. It’s built in the decisions people make every day. Good recurrent training just helps make sure those are the right ones.

Back to Insights